![]() |
| Home Page | Debt Settlement | Debt Consolidation | Debt Management | Credit Counseling | Filing Bankruptcy |
| Legal Advice | Tax Debt Relief | Student Debt | Business Debt | Stop Foreclosure | Credit Report |
|
|
Debt SettlementDebt ConsolidationDebt ManagementCredit CounselingFiling BankruptcyLegal AdviceTax Debt ReliefStudent DebtBusiness DebtStop ForeclosureCredit Report |
Liquidation / DissolutionLiquidation refers to the process by which a company (or part of a company) is brought to an end, and the assets and property of the company redistributed. Liquidation can also be referred to as winding-up or dissolution, although dissolution technically refers to the last stage of liquidation. The process of liquidation also arises when customs, an authority or agency in a country responsible for collecting and safeguarding customs duties, determines the final computation or ascertainment of the duties or drawback accruing on an entry. Liquidation may either be compulsory (sometimes referred to as a creditors' liquidation) or voluntary (sometimes referred to as a shareholders' liquidation, although some voluntary liquidations are controlled by the creditors). Compulsory LiquidationThe parties who are entitled by law to petition for the compulsory liquidation of a company vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but generally, a petition may be lodged with the court for the compulsory liquidation of a company by: 1. the company itself GroundsThe grounds upon which one can apply for a compulsory liquidation also vary between jurisdictions, but the normal grounds to enable an application to the court for an order to compulsorily wind-up the company are: 1. the company has so resolved In practice, the vast majority of compulsory winding-up applications are made under one of the last two grounds. An order will not generally be made if the real purpose of the application is other than for a winding-up, eg. the application is made just to enforce a debt. A "just and equitable" winding-up enable the ground to subject the strict legal rights of the shareholders to equitable considerations. It can take account of personal relationships of mutual trust and confidence in small parties, particularly, for example, where there is a breach of an understanding that all of the members may participate in the business, or of an implied obligation to participate in management. An order might be made where the majority shareholders deprive the minority of their right to appoint and remove their own director. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||